Showing posts with label manners. Show all posts
Showing posts with label manners. Show all posts

Wednesday, 26 January 2011

George Orwell – 1984

A question.

1984 or 2011?

The inhabitants of ??????? particularly the party members, have no real privacy. Many of them live in apartments equipped with two-way telescreens, so that they may be watched or listened to at any time. Similar telescreens are found at workstations and in public places, along with hidden microphones. Written correspondence is routinely opened and read by the government before it is delivered. The Thought Police employ undercover agents, who pose as normal citizens and report any person with subversive tendencies. Children are encouraged to report suspicious persons to the government, and some even denounce their own parents.

This surveillance allows for effective control of the citizenry. The smallest sign of rebellion, even something so small as a facial expression, can result in immediate arrest and imprisonment. Thus, citizens (and particularly party members) are compelled to absolute obedience at all times.

Given the recent hysteria in Britain today surrounding Christian B&B owners, Sports Commentators, sexism, racism, islamaphobia, secularism, the Police, MP’s  expenses, the BBC and press ownership in general (well more in terms of Sky), the list is endless these days but what similarities do we find in the fictional 1984 and actual 21st century Britain?

Answers on a post card please to…..

Saturday, 17 April 2010

Pray we don’t have a hung parliament!

I know it’s easy for many people to chant “lets give them a chance” or “a coalition would be best” or even “a hung parliament is probably best for us all”. Let me just say NONE OF THESE ARE GOOD IDEAS!

Firstly, letting the LibDems in will be terrible beyond belief to all those floating voters who (1) Hate the EU (2) Hate Gordon Brown and New Labour including Blair or (3) don’t vote consistently.  Why?  Because they are further to the left of British politics than Stalin or Pol Pot! That’s Why! [Oh and the Labour Party]

Let me give you ten good reasons why not to let Cleggy near power.

1) Lib/Dems are just not squeaky clean & holier than thou at all

2) The party isn't as Liberal or Democratic as they will tax the pants off us!

3) Vince Cable isn't as good on financial matters as he takes credit for

4) The Party is led by a closet social engineer and exponent of every form of political correctness called Nick Clegg

5) Their existing MPs are not worth a penny

6) They're just as bad on "tax & spend" as the current Labour lot, if not worse. “it’s only cost a penny on tax” I hear them muttering even as I type

7) They're the worst pro-EU party of the lot and that that's not a good thing for all you all you rabid anti EU people who don’t want to vote Labour or UKIP or even BNP!

8) They're one of the worst pro-global warming / Pro-climate change / pro-Scam green tax parties of all, just when it's been exposed as a massive fraud.

9) They've not really changed that much since Jeremy Thorpe was leader or Charles Kennedy or…..

10) An update, [thanks to John Redwood]  and back to Vince Cable again..... he's a "serial flip-flopper"

I would rather fly in the face of 42 years of consistent Tory voting and vote Labour ( even with Gordon Broone at the helm) than suffer the open toed sandals of a powerbase of LibDem MP’s  nannying us into our graves that they will have us dug with our hard earned taxes.

A Final reminder to those of you who hate all things PC… beware the LibDems.

Who hate extra taxes, beware the LibDems

Green taxes, want them?  Beware the LibDems!

Ah that’s better now I have got it off my chest  and with thanks to John Redwoods own Web Pages!

http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/09/14/can-you-think-of-a-better-name-for-the-liberal-democrats/

Friday, 31 July 2009

The right to an opinion........

UPDATED:
I am still very much a firm believer in the right to have an opinion and the freedom of speech in society providing it is not deliberately used to incite violence or any form of racism or religious discrimination. This includes all the other freedoms we have won over many centuries however, I do not like the trend towards the rights of minorities taking precedent over these hard won freedoms of ours and I maintain the right to challenge issues that I feel are wrong.

Here's an example, for many years now I have been the member of an on-line forum where many controversial issues are openly discussed and often very robustly. In fact so robustly at times that the Moderators of the site need to be quick to intervene and either delete the postings or bring cool sanity to an otherwise overheated debate.

However Of late though a growing admittedly minority group of, shall we say, an "older" generation of contributors who are clearly not as erudite, educated, literate or dare I say intelligent enough to be able to counter an argument with cogent well thought through responses resort to abusing the writer personally. Their mode of "attack" is to resort to small, personal slights, not outright ranting attacks, but small irritating snide attacks that are in many ways very painful, even to a crusty old debater such as I. Let me give you an example, suggesting that in my case, my contributions were "pontificating" or "arrogant" or some other unfair negative description. My views were opposite and critical of theirs, nothing less. Of course this is only their view of me, but I have to say that I always like to be forthright and yes, I have strong views which I may express strongly but in clear and cogent terms without personalising or naming anyone in particular.

One type of response I have grown to dislike intensely is the follow up one of my posts with a retort simply says something like "what"? or "meaning"? Rather than typing a full sentence. In these cases I can't bring myself to respond nor to some of the more detailed responses that are riddled with the most terrible spelling errors or complete lack of understanding of basic grammar or punctuation. I am no scholar or academic but I have pride in my use of language and am careful how I present it.

I hate to see poor spelling where little or no effort is made to check BEFORE posting the response. I used to surreptitiously correct spelling and punctuation until it became all too tedious and I became even more despairing of the sheer laziness of the writers.

So, why bother I thought. Why put up with the sniping and innuendo, why correct the spelling, why punctuate the posts and the answer? A was a resounding blank!

I don't want to suffer the stress of it all from these ageing dinosaurs from a past age, these old crusty class warriors who make me cringe at my own working class background, these silly sexist dolts with little or no understanding of the way to deal with disagreement in an intelligent manner. My detractors seek to spread the blame by implying that I am attacking every member of the forum, I am not. But I am attacking those who seem unable to contribute properly.

So I walk away and leave them to it and sadly I am not the first to do so and I am sure I wont be the last. What is more worrying about this and what prompted me to write my thoughts was that this trend seems to be more and more prevalent in society in general. Any scan of Facebook, Youtube or some other social networking sites and you will see these rantings and poorly written posts.

It's back to my brighter side from now on as the burden of the "old world" is behind me now and I don't intend to go back.